In this article I will be presenting information I received from a brother in the LORD I met online, and he understands much of what's going on in the world today, particularly where globalist forces are working relentlessly in achieving a singular, one world government in a socialist mode.
An interesting thing about socialism, and its hard core leftist version (Communism- A communist is simply a socialist with a gun, that's in a hurry) is that when they convert another nation to socialism, one of the first things they do towards that effort is indoctrinate the people with...Marxism?
No, Darwinism! Evolutionary 'theory' that is.
UPDATE as of 11-27-09
EVOLUTION Losing Ground In Classrooms -
According to an international poll released by the British Council, the majority of Americans - 60% - support teaching alternatives to evolution in the science classroom. The percentage is the same for Britons....Of course, the British media reporting this are chagrined. Britain is the birthplace of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution, and the official-sounding British Council, the UK group behind the "Darwin Now" campaign that commissioned the Ipsos MORI poll, have spent precious resources educating the world about Darwin. Now some believe the poll shows that efforts by Darwinist organizations aren't working.
~~ END of UPDATE
-------------------------
UPDATE as of 5-03-10
Our Creator God don't make no 'junk'!
Exploding the Darwin-Friendly Myth of Junk DNA [Excerpts] This just in from [the strong promoter of evolution] Nature Magazine of all places (page no longer available on their web site). [Human genome at ten: Life is complicated: The more biologists look, the more complexity there seems to be. "Not that long ago, biology was considered by many to be a simple science, a pursuit of expedition, observation and experimentation."
~~ END of UPDATE
Before a people can be subjugated to the State, there is a higher authority that must be abrogated: God. If the prevailing view of God is erased from the consciousness of the majority, if governmental policy and law doesn't acknowledge God in any way, they are then free to usurp the ultimate authority for themselves, and they become the 'granter' of "privileges" for no one is granted "inalienable rights" and certainly not granted them by God (as humanists and socialists would annul from the beliefs of the population).
So evolution is the foundation for such humanistic, socialistic systems (and much more than this besides!).
This is also why the first ten chapters of Genesis is criticized, ridiculed, disbelieved by so many, because the account of this first book of Moses would fly in the face of evolutionary beliefs, particularly the creation account. If evolutionary beliefs are maintained then the Gospel and the atoning sacrifice of the LORD Jesus Christ would also be meaningless, and irrelevant: if evolution were true, then death would have been a natural part of creation for millions, and billions of years; not the tragic loss of life via separation from God because of a fall into sin by our progenitors, father Adam, and mother Eve.
This is why it's imperative as Christians that we contend fervently for the Truth of God's Word, for acknowledging Him as Creator, and to refute evolutionary belief systems for the LIE that they are. Evolution would negate our Creator by denying the creation, it would negate our LORD as the authority of Truth and lawful ruler-ship, it would negate our Savior and our need for His supreme sacrifice as the only propitiatory hope of salvation!
Evolution is not a peripheral issue for Christians: we cannot compromise with 'half-way' theories like Theistic Evolution (more about this issue at the end of this article). We must earnestly contend for 'the faith' that has been delivered to us!
With all this said, let's have a look at what Dan Miner has to share with us:
EVOLUTION IS IMPOSSIBLE
Abiogenesis is impossible
No mechanism exists to enable evolution to occur
Evolution has not been observed
Nothing can live with incomplete parts and systems
There is no evidence of evolution
Not enough time for evolution to occur
The Bible is true
ATP Synthase
This tiny protein complex makes as energy-rich compound, ATP (adenosine triphosphate). Each of our trillions of cells performs this reaction about a million times per minute. Over half a body weight of ATP is made and consumed every day! It is a protein complex of at least 29 separately manufactured subunits fit together.
ATP is required in manufacturing DNA, RNA, proteins, clean up debris, transporting chemicals into, out of, and within cells, by the energy released by ATP separating into ADP and a phosphate atom.
ATP synthase occurs on inner membranes of bacterial cells, innermost membranes of mitochondria and chloroplasts of plants and animals.
ATP is made by combining ADP and phosphate, using Hydrogen ion (H+) gradient.
Each cell has thousands of these machines spinning at over 9,000 rpm.
Three ATP molecules are formed by 10 protons for each full rotation of the axle.
ATP is required in the process of making ATP, including over 100 enzymes/machines needed to achieve this!
The energy to create the hydrogen ion gradient comes from photosynthesis and respiration of sugars.
DECEPTIVE TERMINOLOGY
"Related":
This word is used instead of the words ‘similar to’ only to give the impression that they evolved. Similarity is not a valid argument for Evolution, because it is due to design constraints, required for good design.
"Shared":
This word is used where identical proteins or DNA segments are the same between two different kinds of species. It is used to give the impression that one kind evolved from the other kind. The correct wording would be to say the items are alike. To be shared, the same atoms must exist at the same time in both creatures, which would be impossible. The reason they are alike is due to design constraints, required for good design.
"Conserved":
When the same protein, micro system or macromolecule appear in different kinds of life forms, evolutionists say they were ‘conserved’, meaning that they were passed on to offspring during their evolutionary history. This is dishonest, because it is claiming that evolution created them.
"Micro Evolution":
This term was invented by Julian Huxley to label all small non-evolutionary events as a means to trick people into believing that evolution has occurred. The correct term would be ‘small changes’ or ‘changes during normal operational science.’
"Theory of Evolution":
Evolution is not a theory for several reasons:
First, no scientific reason exists that would support it.
Second, no scientific theory has ever been formed to explain how it could be possible. No book even addresses the subject of how a theory could be formed to explain how evolution could occur.
Third, it has been scientifically proven to be impossible. Nothing impossible can be a ‘theory’. It properly should be called ‘the LIE of Evolution’, ‘the RELIGION of Evolution’ or ‘the MYTH of Evolution.’ Please refrain from calling it a theory.
"Descent with Modification":
This term is meaningless, explains nothing, and is used only for painting an illusion in your minds that Evolution occurs.
"Primitive":
Evolutionism requires that all parts, systems, mechanisms, etc. lived and operated at every incomplete step while being built during some unknown process.
They create the illusion of this being possible simply by calling incomplete systems ‘primitive.’ No micro-system can function unless it is complete, and simply imagining that incomplete micro-systems can function by calling them primitive is both dishonest and unscientific.
"Building blocks":
Evolutionists try to give the illusion that if they call proteins ‘building blocks’, that all needed for life is for the so-called ‘building blocks’ to accumulate and ‘presto!’, life will exist [Note from myself, James Fire: the single human cell is enormously, staggeringly complex and deeply involved with processes and mechanisms that it would make the activity of a major metropolis seem inert by comparison! See the article at the link provided].
"Science":
Evolutionists give the illusion that their philosophy/religion is not philosophy/religion by falsely using the word ‘science’. The philosophy of Evolution has been used to replace a belief in God since the tower of Babel. Anaximander wrote about it in 460 bc. In the 1800s, the evolutionists got the idea to call their religion “science” as a trick to get it accepted.
DECEPTIVE TACTICS
False definitions for Evolution:
A definition in science must be precise and very clear. It must have sharp, distinct borders that include only the subjects of definition and exclude everything else. It cannot contain anything common to an opposing model.
Evolutionists use many different definitions so that they can equivocate anytime that they get backed into a corner. They will claim that everything exists because of Evolution, but if tell them that nothing could originate by chance, they’ll reply:
“Evolution is not about abiogenesis, its only about change.” Other times they’ll say the definition is only about a change in alleles over time. They’ll change the definition anytime to avoid giving answers. The only thing they will not do, however, is to give the honest definition of Evolution, the definition that fits the way the word Evolution is used and taught, which is:
“A [failed] belief that God can be replaced as The Creator.” This correct definition shows that evolutionism is atheism.
Vestigial Organs:
This argument claims that many of our organs are useless and were only used in the past when we were a different creature. One example is the appendix. For over 100 years, it has been taught that the appendix has no function, and had a different function in an evolutionary past. Since 1995, however, medical textbooks teach that the appendix is an important part of the immune system, especially for young babies. Today, we also know that the appendix is important to store important bacteria required for digestion during periods of diarrhea. Here are some quotes:
“….the appendix is now thought to be one of the sites where immune responses are initiated.” Hartenstein, Roy, Grolier Encyclopedia, 2002, Grolier Interactive Inc.
“The appendix contains masses of lymphoid tissue that may serve to resist infection.” Van De Graff & Fox, Concepts of Human Anatomy & Physiology, 1999, p. 837
“The appendix is densely populated with lymphocytes and is a significant source of immune cells.” Saladin, K., Anatomy & Physiology, McGraw Hill, 2001, p. 974.
“The mucosa and submucosa of the appendix are dominated by lymphoid nodules, and the appendix’s primary function is an organ of the lymphatic system.” Martini, F., Fundamentals of Anatomy & Physiology, Prentice Hall, 1998, p. 899.
Another example is the coccyx. The evolutionists call it a tail bone and say that it proves we evolved from apes. The coccyx, however, is the last vertebrate and is required for the attachments of nine required muscles, two of which are required for the elimination of waste. They used to promote over 100 examples, but scientists today have revealed their functions. There is no excuse today for the evolutionists to use this fraud today.
False Examples:
This list is almost endless. Every example is always either losing information, which would be the opposite of evolution, or is outright invented fraud.
o Viruses: They don’t reproduce themselves, they are made by cells, and if the cell makes a mistake in the process, the immune system does not recognize them. They do no evolve, they remain viruses and they gain no complexity.
o Bacterial resistance: The resistance is always the result of either using existing information or losing existing information. Here are some examples:
RESISTANCE TO ACTINONIN IS CAUSED BY A LOSS OF ENZYME ACTIVITY
RESISTANCE TO AMPICILLIN IS CAUSED BY A SOS RESPONSE HALTING CELL DIVISION
RESISTANCE TO AZITHROMYCIN IS CAUSED BY LOSS OF A REGULATORY PROTEIN
RESISTANCE TO CHLORAMPHENICOL IS CAUSED BY REDUCED FORMATION OF A PORIN OR A REGULATORY PROTEIN
RESISTANCE TO CIPROFLOXACIN IS CAUSED BY LOSS OF A PORIN OR LOSS OF A REGULATORY PROTEIN
RESISTANCE TO ERYTHROMYCIN IS CAUSED BY REDUCED AFFINITY TO 23S RRNA OR LOSS OF A REGULATORY PROTEIN
RESISTANCE TO FLUOROQUINOLONES IS CAUSED BY A LOSS OF AFFINITY TO GYRASE
RESISTANCE TO IMIOENEM IS CAUSED BY REDUCED FORMATION OF A PORIN
RESISTANCE TO KANAMYCIN IS CAUSED BY REDUCED FORMATION OF A TRANSPORT PROTEIN
RESISTANCE TO NALIDIXIC ACID IS CAUSED BY LOSS OR INACTIVATION OF A REGULATORY PROTEIN
RESISTANCE TO RIFAMPIN IS CAUSED BY LOSS OF AFFINITY TO RNA POLYMERASE
RESISTANCE TO STREPTOMYCIN IS CAUSED BY REDUCED AFFINITY TO 16S RRNA OR REDUCTION OF TRANSPORT ACTIVITY
RESISTANCE TO TETRACYCLINE REDUCED FORMATION OF A PORIN OR A REGULATORY PROTEIN
RESISTANCE TO ZITTERMICIN A IS CAUSED BY A LOSS OF PROTON MOTIVE FORCE
o Sickle-cell anemia: Caused by a mutation replacing one amino acid in the hemoglobin, greatly reducing the amount of oxygen it can carry. This is the opposite of evolution, as it has lost information and function.
Even if losing information might be beneficial in some circumstances, it is still not Evolution, which is required to explain the origin of everything and not the decay of them.
Theological Arguments:
These arguments consist of saying “God would not have done it like that.” This is not scientific, but is inserting one’s world view opinion into the issue. These include imaginary faults in design or examples of destructive mutations due to the curse after the fall. Examples include:
o Blind spot in our eyes. This is the area where the optic nerve leaves the eye, but each eye compensates for the other eye, so that no loss of vision actually occurs.
o Eyes wired backwards. This is often falsely claimed, even by Oxford professor Richard Dawkins who has devoted his life to attacking God, but in reality the eyes are built in the only way possible to get 100% perfection. The inverted human retina is a superior design for vertebrates. Each design is perfectly suited for the environment the organism normally lives in. The facts are too numerous to mention, but any different design would be destructive. See the following link to show the above two assertions of evolutionists are false.
All arguments about imagined inferior designs are due either by ignorance or intentionally to get people to doubt God.
Strawman Arguments:
These arguments use as their basis false interpretations of the evidence that Creationists use. The intentionally misrepresent the Creation model in every area. Examples are:
o Genesis flood: They falsely say the flood of Noah's time would have mixed all sediments and fossils together completely before laying them down, and since the fossils are not fully mixed, then the Genesis flood could not have occurred.
They also falsely say that millions of animals needed to be on the ark, when in reality only a few thousands would have been needed. They falsely say that Noah could not have gathered together all animals for the ark, but God said that He brought all of them to the ark. They falsely say that the ark was not large enough, when in reality studies have shown that the ark was very adequate for the all creatures and also for all needed feed.
RAY COMFORT's awesome video on NOAH, the FLOOD (and the ark)
o Presenting a picture of our Almighty God in a horrible way. (such as “a white-haired old man spoofing everything into existence). I refuse to repeat the other horrible ways they describe our God.
o They falsely accuse Adam and Eve’s family of incest. No marriage is incest unless it is forbidden by God, and God did not put the repulsion of sibling marriages in our conscience until the days of [Moses and the giving of the Law], thus, sibling marriages before them were normal and not incest.
In the beginning, everybody had rich gene pools and no mutational load, thus, no harm in close marriages. Only after the gene pool became more depleted and the mutational load increased was it necessary for God to instill in our consciences the repulsion of sibling marriages. Remember, Evolutionists cannot be against incest, because it would be required after every evolutionary addition, since the remainder of the population had to be eliminated.
Outright Fraud:
Every statement ever used by Evolutionists to promote the lie of Evolution has been fraudulent, since no honest reason can be found to support it. They intentionally misrepresent fossil [record], intentionally falsify drawings and intentionally use old arguments which have been falsified for years.
Vicious Attacks and Slander against Creationist Scientists
Early scriptural geologists: Granville Penn (1761-1844), George Bugg (1769-1851), Andrew Ure (1778-1857), George Fairholme (1789-1846), John Murray (1786?-1851), George Young (1777-1848), William Rhind (1797-1874).
All were highly qualified scientists in geology, but were the most attacked and ignored.
Charles Lyell: He was the most influential, and led the attacks by saying of them: “wholly destitute of geological knowledge”
“incapable of appreciating the force of objections, or of discerning the weight of inductions from numerous physical facts.”
“they endeavor to point out the accordance of the Mosaic history with phenomena which they have never studied”
“every page of their writings proves their consummate incompetence.”
Andrew White said that these scriptural geologists believed that geology was “not a subject of lawful inquiry,” “a dark art,” “dangerous and disreputable,” and “a forbidden province.”
William Williamson, professor of botany in Manchester, described the work of George Young, the most geologically competent scriptural geologist, as “prejudiced rubbish.”
Others ever since: The scriptural geologists have been described as “scientifically worthless,” “scientifically illiterate Bibliolaters,: and “obscurantists.”
Thomas Chalmers: In 1804, a prominent evangelical Scottish Presbyterian theologian, at the age of 24, invented the so-called “gap theory” as an attempt to insert millions of years between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. He had no geological experience but out of ignorance, he joined in the attack against the qualified scriptural geologists Penn, Gisborne, and others.
Davis Young, A Christian geologist, progressive creationist, has falsely said that no scriptural geologist in the early to mid 1800s had any real knowledge of geology.
The Geological Society of London was established in 1807 by 13 wealthy, cultured gentlemen who lacked much in geological knowledge but was dominated by men who held the old age [of Earth] view.
Censorship:
Today it’s almost impossible to get scientific facts into the classroom that is against Evolution. The 14 major textbook publishers have stated that they will not even read the manuscript for a textbook if written by a Creationist. Teachers will be removed if it is found out that they are teaching any scientific fact that is against the lie of Evolution. Colleges today follow what they call the “ABC” rule—anything but a Christian. Students known to be a Creationist will usually be denied a PhD degree. Tenure, grants and promotions are usually restricted to Evolutionists.
Secrecy:
Evolutionists want no debates, no discussions and no publicity about this issue. They do not want people to know that a large number of scientists do not believe in Evolution. They always lie and say that all scientists believe in Evolution.
They put pressure on the News-Gazette to reject most of my letters now. They have a rule nationwide to never debate a Creationist. Eugenie Scott, director of the National Center for Science Education Defending The Teaching of Evolution in Public Schools, urges Evolutionists to avoid debates with Creationists, as they will lose.
She then says that if you do debate a Creationist to don’t try to defend Evolution, but instead to attack the Creation model, then she lists fraudulent strawman arguments.
Use Liberal Preachers:
This has always been one of evolutionist’s strongest weapons. They get apostate preachers to testify for them against Creationists which is very effective.
Under these various disciplinary schools, both Secular Humanism (S.H.) and Biblical Christianity (B.C.) have their points of view: they are listed here for your consideration-
Under the disciplinary school of Theology:
S.H. - Atheism B.C. - Theism
Under the disciplinary school of Philosophy:
S.H. - Naturalism B.C. - Supernaturalism
Ethics:
S.H. - Relativism B.C. - Absolutes
Biology:
S.H. - Evolution B.C. - Creation
Psychology:
S.H. - Self-Actualization B.C. - Spirit-Mind/Body
(redemption)
Sociology:
S.H. Non-traditional Family B.C. - Traditional Family
Law:
S.H. - Positive Law B.C. - Biblical & Natural Law
Politics:
S.H. - World Government B.C. - Justice, Freedom
Economics:
S.H. - Socialism B.C. - Stewardship of Property
History:
S.H. - Historical evolution B.C. - Historical Resurrection
(revisionism) (documented artifacts)
For your further consideration please feel free to explore these web sites dealing with Creationist ideology as they pertain to Biblical truth and documented evidence as it appears in nature:
http://www.icr.org/
http://www.answersingenesis.org/
One last note to make (from myself, James Fire):
If the Restorationists and Dominionists have their way, all the world will be Christianized (the thesis), which doesn't necessarily mean the world will be converted to Biblical Christianity, merely that the Christian church will become so dominant that everyone will adhere to Christian principles of living.
If on the other hand, Atheists and Humanists have their way, all the world will become rationalistic in their world view, and abandon religion and religious books altogether (the anti-thesis); science and the rule of man over mankind will be the standard of life.
Yet scripture teaches us that in the last days, the Beast will rise to power and people will worship him as "God". This idea of 'worship' and 'God' contradicts the hopeful world view and the prospects of atheists. At the same time, what will be worshipped will be a man indwelt by Satan, the very "father of lies" that scripture speaks of, hardly a 'Christianized' world (including lies such as evolution [or as I am fond of spelling it 'evilution']).
What will transpire in the last days will be a synthesis of these two opposites:
THEISTIC EVOLUTION - That is, God using evolution as the means to prompt the creationary process. By this means, the fulfillment of Satan's promise to mankind of acheiving 'godhood' remains intact by such supposedly evolutionary processes, yet at the same time, he can claim supreme godhood himself and coerce the worship of this world's citizens.
May we stand boldly for the TRUTH in all things, and may the LORD Jesus bless our efforts by His Spirit.
~~ brother James
Kent Hovind takes 1 HR and 47 minutes to explain why:
UPDATE- 11/14/09 -
From The BEREAN CALL:
November 13, 2009
DEMISE OF ANOTHER EVOLUTIONARY PERCH
The Demise of Another Evolutionary Link: Archaeopteryx Falls From Its Perch
[Excerpts] A few days ago we saw Ida fall from her overhyped status as an ancestor of humans. Now some scientists are claiming that Archaeopteryx should lose its status as an ancestor of modern birds.
Calling Archaeopteryx an "icon of evolution," the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) borrows a term from Jonathan Wells while reporting that "[t]he feathered creature called archaeopteryx, easily the world's most famous fossil remains, had been considered the first bird since Charles Darwin's day.
When researchers put its celebrity bones under the microscope recently, though, they discovered that this icon of evolution might not have been a bird at all" (Hotz, "Bye Bye Birdie: Famed Fossil Loses Avian Perch," The Wall Street Journal, page A1, October 23, 2009).
According to the new research, inferences about growth rates made from studies of Archaeopteryx's ancient fossilized bones show it developed much more slowly than modern birds. While the WSJ is reporting these doubts about Archaeopteryx's ancestral status as if they were something new, those who follow the intelligent design movement know that such skepticism has been around for quite some time.
Archaeopteryx isn't the only evolutionary icon losing its claim as the ancestor of birds. In recent months we've seen paleontologists increasingly arguing that the entire clade of dinosaurs should no longer be considered ancestral to birds. As the WSJ article states:There are lingering doubts that birds today are descendants of dinosaurs.
Researchers at Oregon State University recently argued that the distinctive anatomy that gives birds the lung capacity needed for flight means it is unlikely that birds descended from dinosaurs like archaeopteryx and its kin. Their findings were published in June in the Journal of Morphology. As paleontologist John Ruben of Oregon State was quoted saying when his article was published: But old theories die hard, Ruben said, especially when it comes to some of the most distinctive and romanticized animal species in world history.
"Frankly, there's a lot of museum politics involved in this, a lot of careers committed to a particular point of view even if new scientific evidence raises questions," Ruben said. In some museum displays, he said, the birds-descended-from-dinosaurs evolutionary theory has been portrayed as a largely accepted fact, with an asterisk pointing out in small type that "some scientists disagree."
"Our work at OSU used to be pretty much the only asterisk they were talking about," Ruben said. "But now there are more asterisks all the time. That's part of the process of science" ("Discovery Raises New Doubts About Dinosaur-bird Links,"
ScienceDaily, June 9, 2009).
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2009/10/the_demise_of_another_evolutio.html
The above article was taken from an email sent by The Berean Call http://www.thebereancall.org/
Let us end this article with yet another LIVING WATERS production,
EVOLUTION vs. GOD
Other Links of Interest -
• Genetic Engineers Unwind Species Barrier - Creation.com
• Definitions of 'Evolution' - SIU Department of Zoology
• Peer-Reviewed & Peer-Edited Scientific Publications Supporting The Theory Of Intelligent Design - The Discovery Institute
• November 30th ID v. Evolution Debate - Beverly Hills - The Discovery Institute
• Studies On Creation and Evolution - Koinonia House
