Sunday, May 6, 2012

Review of Dr. Stan Monteith's Brotherhood of Darkness - Part 6b

Up until now there has been much exposure in these articles on esoteric and somewhat amorphous organizations and societies whose presence in 'the real world' is somewhat murky; however the following elements in this article are very visible and discernible.

In this article, we will be looking at the forces of Communism, Socialism, Secular Humanism, and various Tax-Exempt Foundations, all of which are geared towards globalism. We must keep in mind that the very idea of globalism in this fallen world is a concept and goal that is for the most part, highly occultic and satanic in its inspiration.

The world attempted to become 'global' at the Tower of Babel, yet God interfered and disrupted this endeavor - unless there was evil intent and plans at this Tower, why then would God disband humanity and establish segregation via multiple languages?
It's interesting that IBM ran an advertisement some years ago showing an illustration of the archaic Tower of Babel, but further up, this structure was transformed into a sophisticated communications array, with an accompanying caption that read "We are undoing the Babel Effect".

In other words, through technology and particularly through computers, this linguistic segregation established by God is being undone (temporarily) by mere mortals whose master is the god of this world (2 COR 4:4).

What about the organizations just mentioned above? Are these likewise satanic in their inspirations? That, we shall soon see . . .

Communism -
The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose . . . The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history... Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive. David Rockefeller, 1973.

This visit by Rockefeller was during a time of severe upheaval in China known as the Cultural Revolution. Yet the bloody and violent means of eradicating (which meant killing somewhere between 40 and 60 million people!) non-Maoist influences in China was deemed "one of the most successful in history" by this globalist that considered these policies as "enormous social advances"?!

Dr. Stan comments on Communism:

"Did we really win the Cold War? Some people contend that communism is still a threat because the CFR [which Rockefeller belongs to], the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome are communist front organizations. They justify that belief by noting that Mikhail Gorbachev, a life long member of the KGB and former dictator of the USSR, is currently working with members of the first three organizations, and is a member of the fourth, the Club of Rome." (Taken from the Club of Rome web site, June 2000)

Bella Dodd, former Communist and member of the Central Committee of the American Communist Party (before WW2) was concerned how they would maintain contact with the Soviet Union, maintain the party line, and receive pertinent information from that government should war break. A Soviet diplomat informed Ms. Dodd to contact one of three men living at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel if they needed any information. She recognized the names as well-known financiers of Wall Street and was astonished that she was directed to them as voices authorized to speak on behalf of the Soviet Union. Bella Dodd became a Christian and told her story to any that would listen. Thomas Schuman, former member of the KGB told a similar tale.
From an interview with Robert Goldsborough, Radio Liberty, Dec. 28, 1999 (see

There came a day in 1964 when David Rockefeller visited Nikita Krushchev, former dictator of the USSR, and after that meeting, he was deposed and sent to Siberia. The question is rightly asked, "Who would have the authority to fire the dictator of the USSR?"
Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Concord Press, Rossmore, California, 1972, p. 107.

Rockefeller* and his kin are well known as globalists (or "internationalists"), and David himself was the chairman of the CFR for over fifteen years, also a Bilderberger member and financier and founder of the Trilateral Commission. In my mind, this nefarious man is as culpable for the dire situation we find ourselves in, in today's world, as Colonel Edward Mandell House (another sympathizer and supporter of Russian Communism in its infancy) back in the early 20th century).

* “Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405

Dr. Stan asks, "Is it possible that communism and capitalism are working together to create a world government?" One could easily come to such a conclusion, considering how the Hegelian Dialectic works, and observing how Capitalist Americans have supported Communism politically and economically. Such are the researched assertions of Professor Antony Sutton in his book Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution; here is a youtube presentation on Professor Sutton's summary on this book and his research.

For your consideration, here is a 40 minute presentation with Professor Antony Sutton, based on his book, The Best Enemies Money Can Buy. I would highly recommend you set aside some time and view this youtube film at a later.

GOODFIGHT ministries uploaded this presentation on their site and states: A classic interview by Professor Antony Sutton, who taught economics at California State University, and was a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.In this talk, Prof. Sutton goes into his impeccable research on how a close-knit group of Western financiers and industrialists (centered around Morgan and Rockefeller in the US, and around Milner and the City financiers, in the UK) created and sustained their three supposed enemies right from the very beginning: Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, and FDR's Fabian socialism.Particularly, he goes into how Wall Street/City of London financiers used their banking institutions and their industrial enterprises.

Socialism -
I also made it quite clear that Socialism means equality of income or nothing, and that under Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not the character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well. George Bernard Shaw, An Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, p. 470.

In June 1957, Nikita Khrushchev, Soviet Communist Party boss, was interviewed before a nation-wide American television audience. With calm assurance he stated: " . . . I can prophesy that your grandchildren in America will live under socialism. And please do not be afraid of that. Your grandchildren will . . . not understand how their grandparents did not understand the progressive nature of a socialist society." J. Edgar Hoover, Masters of Deceit, Holt, Rinehard and Winston, New York, 1958, p. 3.

Nikita Khruschev advocated socialism in the United States, not communism. Every communist works to establish socialism because they are taught that socialism is a transitional stage between capitalism and communism [and I might add, that Democracy is a transitional stage between capitalism and the rule of just law (a republic) and socialism]. There are socialist organizations in every country and the Socialist International coordinates the worldwide socialist movement. It is one of the four most powerful groups in the world, yet most people have never heard of it, says Dr. Stan.

George Bernard Shaw (quoted earlier) was instrumental in organizing the Fabian Socialist Society in 1884; he and his friends (H.G. Wells included) brought this force to life and it's been alive and well ever since. Where Fabian Socialism differs from Communism is that it seeks transition in any nation it intends on converting by a slow and gradual process by means of cultivating minds with socialist ideas, rather than the forced conversion at gun point all at once.

I once heard a rather humorous quip: "The difference between a socialist and a communist is that the communist is a socialist with a gun that's in a hurry!"

Antonio Gramsci was an Italian Communist who lived during the time of Mussolini's reign, and who tried to persuade the Italian dictator to go the way of what we now know as Fabianism, that is the slower and more patient approach to converting the nation. Mussolini instead threw him into prison, where he wrote many books. These books were later read by Saul Alinsky whose own books (such as Rules for Radicals) have in turn been read by many of our Federal level politicians, including Barak Obama. According to this article (link above) Obama not only read these books, but was an active participant in educating people on the Alinsky method of transitioning people into this Marxist way of thinking.

Here is a quote from an article by Berit Kjos of Crossroads ministries:

"Antonio Gramsci was the first Communist leader to see through the illusion. While firmly committed to global Communism, he knew that that violence would fail to win the West. American workers (proletariat) would never declare war on their middle class neighbors as long as they shared common Christian values. So the Italian communist -- a contemporary of Lenin -- wrote an alternative plan for a silent revolution. The main weapons would be deception, manipulation and infiltration. Hiding their Marxist ideology, the new Communist warriors would seek positions of influence in seminaries, government, communities, and the media."

In the introductory page of Rules for Radicals, by S. Alinsky we have the following dedication from the author:

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history... the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.

On another note, its the allegation of Richard Wurmbrand that Karl Marx himself was a satanist!

Back to Dr. Stan's book - -

"Leaders of both political parties support socialism, but Republican leaders pretend to oppose it." Is this true? I wasn't so easily convinced at first, but as I delved into the matter, over a course of time, I reluctantly became persuaded that this is, in fact the case. Dr. Carroll Quigley comments on Cecil Rhodes' Secret Society and its aims for America:

The chief problem of American political life for along time has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international…(therefore) argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers…Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Tragedy and Hope: 1247-1248.

An American Union as Dreamed of by Cecil Rhodes

Watch this video presentation on Cecil Rhodes and his agenda Cecil Rhodes and the Round Table Groups (9 mins, 41 seconds).

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of Liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened. Norman Thomas, former leader of the Socialist Party in the United States.
America us getting socialism on the installment plan through programs of the welfare state. There is more real socialism in the United States today than there is in the Soviet Union. Earl Browder, former chairman of the American Communist Party, as quoted in the Pittsburgh Press, June 9, 1966.

"The Socialist International coordinates its efforts with the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome. All of them work to establish a world government. The question is: Who will be in control?" asks Dr. Stan.

Secular Humanism -
. . . we reject those features of traditional religious morality that deny humans a full appreciation of their own potentialities and responsibilities. Traditional religions often offer solace to humans, but as often, they inhibit humans from helping themselves . . . Paul Kurtz, Humanist Manifesto I and II, Prometheus Books, New York, 1973, p. 16.
Dr. Stan notes: "Francis Schaeffer studied the decline of Western civilization, and he came to the conclusion that secular humanism is responsible for our problems because secular humanists advocate abortion, homosexuality, prisoner's rights, socialism, world government, and deny the existence of God. Every socialist and communist is a secular humanist, and although every humanist is not a communist, every communist is a secular humanist."

Paul Kurtz, quoted above helped to develop the Humanist Manifesto which itself outlines seventeen concepts that would change the world; they are listed here:

1) Reject traditional [note: but not merely 'religious beliefs; could Secular Humanism become Religious Humanism, with a New Age religion that opposes 'traditional' religions?] religious beliefs, and seek "new human purposes and goals". Humanists proclaim there is "no divine purpose or providence for the human species . . . no deity will save us; we must save ourselves".

2) Reject as both illusory and harmful the "promises of immortal salvation or fear of eternal damnation . . ." which are the basis of both Judaic and Christian beliefs.

3) Believe that "moral values derive . . . from human experience. Ethics is autonomous and situational [Situational ethics]" and that we should "strive for the good life, here and now". Thus humanists believe that individuals determine what is right and wrong [The same ethic as Satanists who declare, "Do what thou wilt, shall be the whole of thy law"].

4) Believe that "reason and intelligence" will guide mankind to a better world.

5) Stress individual freedom without moral restraints.

6) Recognize ". . . the right to birth control, abortion, divorce," and that ". . . the many varieties of sexual exploration should not in themselves be considered 'evil'. This humanists condone homosexuality and other forms of sexual perversion.

7) Support concepts of individual freedom such as "an individual's right to die with dignity, euthanasia and the right to suicide".

8) Advocate democracy and participatory democracy rather than a republican [rule of just law, in the case of America, this was based primarily on the Bible] form of government.

9) Advocate the "separation of church and state and the separation of ideology and state". This program was designed to remove both God and prayer from public schools.

10) Advocate "alternative economic systems", and the need to "democratize the economy". Humanists promote socialism.

11) Advocate the "elimination of all discrimination based upon race, religion, sex, age, or national origin," and "the right to universal education". They also oppose "sexism or sexual chauvinism". This requires governmental control over every aspect of our lives.

12) Support the ending of nationhood and national sovereignty and advocate a "world community".

13) State that "this world community must renounce the resort to violence and force method of solving international disputes." They want a one world government which includes an international court.

14) Advocated that "the world community . . . engage in cooperative planning concerning the use of rapidly depleting resources . . . population growth must be checked." This is the basis of modern-day environmentalism and population control (overpopulation is an unsubstantiated theory that holds no water. Review the video at the link provided which ably demonstrates how this is a myth, promoted by globalists whose agenda is to drastically reduce the world's population. Reason: to more ably control the masses (a smaller class room is easier to control than a larger one).

15) Propose foreign aid and birth control for developing nations.

16) Since "technology is a vital key to human progress . . . " they oppose "any moves to censor basic scientific research on moral, political or social grounds.

17) Call for " . . . international cooperation in culture, science, the arts and technology across ideological borders. We must learn to live openly together or we shall perish together."

"Most of these concepts that are advocated in the Humanist Manifesto," says Dr. Stan, "have been implemented, and their plan to introduce socialsim, create a world government and undermind the Judeo-Christian beliefs of our nation are well on the way to completion. Is secular humanism the force behind unfolding world events?"

No comments: