Friday, May 29, 2009

POPULATION CONTROL - Something From Our Past Or Coming In Our Future?


MARGARET SANGER
ADOLF HITLER
HELENA BLAVATSKY
Population Control is something we know about historically in the old regime of the Soviet U.S.S.R. and Nazi Germany; something that even now is known to occur in last significant bastions of communism, China and North Korea (the distinction might be made that population control and birth control are not necessarily the same thing).

Without Charles Darwin, the idea of population control wouldn't be justified by those committing these acts.

But what does Charles Darwin have to do with this issue? Without his theory of evolution, such ideals as represented by those who espouse the value of population control/elimination would not have manifested as a primary factor in our world!

Not many people are aware of the full title of "Origin Of The Species", Darwin's book. Note the part of the full title in red:

The Origin of Species
by Means of Natural Selection,
or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
First Edition
( http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/origin.html ).

In the theory of evolution, man is just another animal, more highly evolved, more intelligent perhaps, but certainly of no greater, or lesser value than any other species, including slime, and fungi. I know that just warms your heart!

Yet take note that the phrase "Favoured (sic) Races" has certain implications; it doesn't say species, but races, as in White, Negro, Oriental, etc.! If there are favored races, then are their unfavored races? This insinuates superior and inferior races, and to this the likes of Hitler, Stalin, and others would agree! So much so, that they were committed to genocide, and 'human weeding' even among members of their own countries, those deemed inferior, unfit for survival (primarily, but not exclusively Jews, and Christians).Yet Jews and Christians are no longer threatened by such a mind set by those who deem themselves superior and exclusively worthy of survival; right?

Evolution then, is a foundation of what is being perpetrated on the world today in the form of population control, but its not the only key factor:

The Theosophical Society is also a powerful proponent of population control, eliminating undesireables, and guaranteeing the survival of these "favored races".

What is the Theosophical Society? Its an organization started, in part by Madame Helena Blavatsky (seen in picture [far left] above with Hitler). For a basic understanding (and the politically correct answer), I give you wikipedia:

The Theosophical Society was founded in New York City, USA, in 1875 by Helena Blavatsky, Henry Steel Olcott, William Quan Judge and others. Its initial objective was the investigation, study and explanation of mediumistic phenomena. After a few years Olcott and Blavatsky moved to India and established the International Headquarters at Adyar, Madras (Chennai). There, they also became interested in studying Eastern religions, and these were included in the Society's agenda. After several iterations the Society's objectives have evolved to be:
to form a nucleus of the universal brotherhood of humanity without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste, or colour.

To encourage the study of comparative religion, philosophy, and science. To investigate the unexplained laws of nature and the powers latent in man.
In addition to the stated objectives, as early as 1889 Blavatsky purportedly had told a group of Theosophical students that the real purpose of establishing the Society was to prepare humanity for the reception of the World Teacher when he appeared again on earth. This was repeated again more publicly by Annie Besant in 1896, five years after Blavatsky's death. [1] In Blavatsky's own writings, the only reference to a similar idea indicated that it would not be for at least a century (approx. 1996?) [2]. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theosophical_Society )

For any who would like to investigate Theosophy in more detail, follow the blog provided here:


I will attempt to summarize what this powerful organization believes through a couple sources of my own, Handbook Of Today's Religions by Josh McDowell and Don Stewart. Another good source if interested, is Dr. Walter Martin's The Kingdom of the Cults, Bethany House Publishers; copy right 1965.

Theosophy means 'wisdom of God' and was founded by Helena Blavatsky in 1875; wisdom is to be found in "all religions" including Christianity, however Blavatsky harbored a detestation for it. It possesses no sacred books; revelation comes from 'adepts' that is, "beings perfected spiritually, intellectually, and physically, the flower of human, and all evolution." (from the Theosophical Movement, pg. 112)

Quotes from Theosophy:

"We reject the idea of a personal God, we believe in a universal divine principle, the root of all, from which all proceeds, and within which all shall be absorbed at the end of the great cycle of being. "

Theosophy teaches that man is equal to God, " . . . for you are God, and you only will what God wills; but you must dig deep down into yourself to find God within you and listen to His voice for it is your voice." (Kristinamurti, At The Feet Of The Master)

" . . . for Christ . . . the true esoteric saviour . . . is no man but the DIVINE PRINCIPLE in every human being" (Blavatsky, Studies in Occultism, Theosophical University Press, pg. 134).

"No one is to blame except for ourselves for our birth conditions, our character, our opportunities, our abilities , for all these things are due to the working out of forces we have set going either in this life or in former lives . . . " (Irving S. Cooper, Theosophy Simplified, pg. 55).

Theosophy believes that the majority of humanity lives today on the "animal soul" level. This as opposed to being an Atlantean, which is a person highly developed, and thus more worthy of life, than those who merely exist on an animal level.

An adept is a being from the spirit world that communicates revelation, and these are known as 'Bodhisatta' or 'Mahatma'. Obviously the most worthy of life.

What does any of this have to do with population control?

Helena Blavatsky was succeeded by Annie Besant, who was succeeded by Alice Bailey; a contemporary of hers, also a high ranking member of Theosophy was Margaret Sanger (Her picture (middle) is besides that of Adolf Hitler at the top of this posting.

Margaret Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood.

Surely Margaret would've kept her religious beliefs apart from her conduct as practised in an organization such as Planned Parenthood?

Take a look at what Dr. Stan Monteith says ( http://www.radioliberty.com/ A link to this site available under 'Ponderings' at the right column), who has researched dozens of subjects revolving around the New World Order, population control not the least!

"Planned population control including genocide is a difficult concept for Americans to accept. Even though the U.S. government helps finance the Red Chinese program of forced abortion, sterilization and infanticide, and helps finance the United Nations "family planning program," most people find it impossible to believe that such programs are really part of a larger plan to kill off large segments of the world's population.
"How can you possibly believe that?" I am frequently asked. The answer is quite simple: I have read the writings of those who intend to depopulate large segments of the earth and I believe them. They have written of the necessity of reducing-by force if necessary-the world's population."

To read these articles by Dr. Monteith, check out the following:



For the unedited version of this two part article, with foot notes and plan of action, please visit this site on radioliberty.com:


Margaret Sangers theosophical beliefs were the very foundation for her justification of killing off what she referred to as 'human weeds'. Here are a couple quotes from the above articles for your convenience. I highly recommend you take time to read the above articles, they will enlighten and shock you.

"the extermination of 'human weeds'...the 'cessation of charity'...the segregation of 'morons, misfits, and the maladjusted' and...the sterilization of 'genetically inferior races?'"2

She affiliated with, and endorsed Nazi programs, and solicited the participation of one of these men in her own organization (PP):

During the 1930s Margaret Sanger published The Birth Control Review, in which she openly supported Nazi Germany's "infanticide program" in the 1930s, and publicly championed Adolf Hitler's goal of Aryan white supremacy. Prior to World War II she commissioned Nazi Ernst Rudin, director of the dreaded German medical experimentation programs, to serve as an advisor to her organization.

Another organization that's intent on population control is Council of The Club of Rome:

In The First Global Revolution, published by the Council of the Club of Rome, an international elitist organization, the authors note that, "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."8

This from another member, Bertrand Russell:

In The Impact of Science on Society, Bertrand Russell said, "At present the population of the world is increasing...War so far has had no great effect on this increase... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others...If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full...the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of others."

Here is another source that elaborates on the thinking of Bertrand Russell:
Do you remember back in the 1970's, in the school class room, we all learned about the pesticide DDT and how terribly harmful to the environment it was? Well, guess what? Read this from part 2 of Dr. Monteith's article:

In 1970 the National Academy of Sciences, in their book Life Sciences, stated that, "In little more than two decades DDT has prevented 500 million deaths due to malaria."
To population control advocates, this preservation of human life was intolerable, so they set out to outlaw further use of the pesticide. Up until 1970 all reliable scientific data had consistently demonstrated that DDT was safe for both humans and animals. Indeed, DDT was the safest pesticide ever known to mankind. Furthermore, it was inexpensive and could be widely used in third-world countries to control the spread of insect-borne diseases.

In regards to more harmful pesticides that have taken the place of DDTs, one doctor, a Dr. Charles Wurster, one of the major opponents of DDT, was asked: whether a ban on DDT wouldn't actually result in far greater use of more toxic pesticides. Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied, "So what? People are the cause of all the problems. We have too many of them. We need to get rid of some of them and this is as good a way as any."

When asked by the same reporter, "Doctor, how do you square the killing of people with the mere loss of some birds?" Dr. Wurster is reported to have replied, "It doesn't really make a lot of difference, because organophosphate acts locally and only kills farm workers and most of them are Mexicans and Negroes."4

Do you see the calloused indifference that these people show in regards to human life? Do you understand that there are people, in places of power, that actually think in such terms as this?

There's more: Now I'd like to turn to K-House and I have both text, and audio files for you to examine.

Behold A Pale Horse - 66/40 - K-House These are audio files.

http://www.khouse.org/articles/1998/150/ This is an article.

On the subject of A.I.D.S. you may not be aware of its origins, or the intent behind this dreadful disease. I submit a reading of the book by Dr. Leonard Horowitz, EMERGENT VIRUSES: A.I.D.S. and EBOLA is necessary to get the exhaustive explanation of this entire affair. I've read it, and it sickened me, how people at the highest levels of authority can 'play God' and interfere with people's lives, and threaten their existence!

In the meanwhile, check out this web link; this is an expose by Dr. Strecker, the man who was on the inside track to all of this, and later came out to reveal the truth:


The WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION has stated that condoms are necessary for safe sex, but if one compares the material of a condom under an electron microscope, it looks like a sponge with all of its holes, which measure considerably larger than the A.I.D.S. virus itself. The comparison has been made, " . . . its like trying to stop a B.B with a chain link fence".

Certainly W.H.O. would be aware of this fact! Why would they intentionally lie, allowing countless millions to believe they are safe, only to become infected with AIDS, which can take up to 10 years to incubate w/o symptoms, thereby infecting many others unawares?!

A form of population control?

In order to control any population, numbers must be reduced to more managable parameters; this philosophy was long held in esteem by various Soviet leaders, notably Stalin, and other dictators who had the power elite's self-interest at heart.

Stalin was famous for saying, "You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs."

For more information on this subject please visit:


and this blog:


So what is our response to all of this? What can we "little people" do against the likes of these enormous, gigantic global forces that apparently want to drastically reduce the world's population, including you? and me?

First of all, recognize that our days are in the hands of the LORD Himself, it is HE that has numbered our days!

PSALM 90:12
So teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom.

PSALM 143:8
Cause me to hear thy lovingkindness in the morning; for in thee do I trust: cause me to know the way wherein I should walk; for I lift up my soul unto thee.

No matter what may be arrayed against us, remember that our ultimate enemy, and really our ONLY enemy, is Satan, and it is he that desires our destruction. So whether you're talking about swine flu, or A.I.D.S. or any other contrivance of devious science, the LORD is our shield and our defense!

PSALM 91:1-10
He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty. I will say of the LORD,
He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust. Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence. He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust:
his truth shall be thy shield and buckler. Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.
A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee. Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked.
Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation; There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.

Remember, that while this threat is real, and certainly not something academic or abstract; these are real people, with a real agenda that is really being implemented covertly in ways more invasive than even what I've described in this posting!

But GOD . . . is our shield and fortress; an ever present help in time of need.


As I stated before, to ignore all of these trends, activities, activities and yes, even 'conspiracies' is wrong, and at the same time to fear or even panic is unwarranted: GOD IS STILL ON THE THRONE AND HE ISN'T ABOUT TO GIVE IT UP!

Please meditate on Psalms 2 and 9 for encouragement today!

May the LORD JESUS CHRIST bless all of you saints . . . WAY TOO MUCH!

Yours in the battle,

Nikaeo Aionios A.V.R.A.S.!

brother James
UPDATE on POPULATION CONTROL:

3 comments:

GoodNewsAtheism said...

The common creationist canard- that is, blaming every social ill of the 20th century on Charles Darwin- is already a little played out, don't you think, Mr. Fire? The premise of the 'argument,' such as it is, is exposed as ridiculous just by pointing out that population control mechanisms FAR predate Darwin. Should we blame Darwin for Confucius's advocacy of population control? Plato and Aristotle had visions of an ideal population for Greek city-states. Is that Darwin's fault as well? The founder of the modern population control movement was Thomas Malthus, who I believe was a clergyman! Population control is about conserving resources, not about evolution (whatever you think that is).

James J. Fire said...

While I tend to agree that the idea of population control pre-dates the 19th century, and Darwin's theory of evolution, the more modern trends of this operative thinking is justified by many, who, having read Origin Of The Species, and believe the need to ensure the 'survival of the fittest' as a righteous cause.
I don't 'blame' Darwin for the actions of these people, certainly, any more than I would blame the Bible for Jim Jones' actions in poisoning his followers.
Jones justified his actions by referring to the Bible (but then later declared that he HIMSELF was the Word of God, and that the Bible is useless).
Nor would I find it necessary to blame "every social ill of the 20th century on Charles Darwin".
It's enough to acknowledge that his ideology permeates our global society, and we think of ourselves as 'thinking apes' as it were, no more worthy to survive than microbial slime.
The sort of population control you're referring to is not the same brand as those who are the power elite in today's world. In their view, population control is not the same thing as birth control, but "the extermination of human weeds". Certainly you don't endorse THIS sort of conduct?

James J. Fire said...

Also GoodNewsAtheism, please consider the FULL title of Darwin's book which indeed is most illuminating, considering which races he felt needed favouring, as opposed to others that did not.