Saturday, October 10, 2015



Tragedy has once again struck at the heart of America, this time at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon. The following were the victims who were shot to death:

Lucero Alcaraz, 19, Quinn Glen Cooper, 18, Kim Saltmarsh Dietz, 59, Lucas Eibel,18, Jason Dale Johnson, 33, Lawrence Levine, 67, Sarena Dawn Moore, 44, Treven Taylor Anspach, 20, and Rebecka Ann Carnes, 18 (Source)

The shooter was Chris Harper-Mercer, by all accounts, a problem child and troubled teen, a loner who was discharged from the Army just five weeks into basic.
On the day of the shooting, it was reported that he inquired of his victims whether or not they were Christian; if so, they earned a bullet in the head rather than in the legs if they were not. A rather peculiar aspect of this case is the way that the media has massaged the facts to produce a more controversial issue based in part on ethnicity. We have been led to believe that Mr. Mercer is Caucasian, haven't we? Along with some other supposed facts, what is the real deal here? Check out this article.

The President addressed the nation  and said that the shooter was someone likely to suffer from some form of mental illness; that America is the only nation that hasn't enough gun safety laws in the face of mass killings. He urged the American people support stricter gun laws, to “politicize the issue”.

The issue of gun control is a hot bed of controversy: there are those who claim that if we had stricter gun control laws, we would be safer as a nation; that there are sufficient guns among the various law enforcement agencies, and ownership of firearms among the public is superfluous. 

Others say that if gun laws became more strict, that they would eventually fall under the control of the Federal government, that would issue special licensing for a relative minor percentage of the nation – or even outlaw guns altogether; that our people would be imperiled and at the mercy of criminals accustomed to breaking the law to obtain what they want. Criminals in the private sector or political, that is . . . 

One of the reasons why State militias were sanctioned by our founding fathers was that in the event the Federal government were ever to overstep its Constitutional boundaries and became belligerent, the States could force it to step back.

Universities and college campuses are commonly designated as 'gun-free zones' as are many major US cities like Chicago and Washington D.C. Statistics are in ample supply to show that such zones are provisional for shooters as 'easy prey'  are everywhere: because they know the chances of any one firing back any time soon is virtually nil. 

What would have happened if a gun owner happened to be in the same locality of Chris Mercer just as an off-duty sheriff's deputy was in the vicinity of Jesus Garcia, a gun wielding shooter who terrified restaurant workers who fled to the next door movie theater? He was stopped before he did too much damage.

There wasn't however, because that college campus was a gun-free zone, and Mercer knew that. He didn't decide to go out and try to victimize some people who were out on a shooting range with their rifles. He chose his location based, at the very least in part, on the fact that there would most likely be no other people with guns that could challenge him. 

The idea of screening potential gun owners for criminal records and or mental problems is not the controversy; even the most ardent 2nd Amendment Rights Activist should agree with such policy (just as those caught with too many DUI's should lose their driver's license). Guns should be forbidden to such people, and those with criminal intent towards such things as terrorism*

Gun owners that are responsible citizens, and use such weapons for good, should always have access to their weapons to safeguard themselves, their families and people who might find themselves imperiled by a maddened shooter.

Obviously we should be responsible as a nation regarding who should be able to purchase and own a gun and who should not; any one with a felony, any one who is not “sound of mind” and unable to demonstrate rational judgment, and certain other select situations and cases should warrant the restriction of such a right to bear arms. 

[* What about 'potential terrorists'? There are those who consider certain types of Christians as 'potential terrorists' – those that believe in the last days, according to biblical prophecy; who believe that one world government is evil as is the new world order; who ascribe the idea of conspiracy as a credible plausibility, that hold dear the Constitution and our Second Amendment Rights, among other such beliefs.
For more 'qualifiers' as to who a potential terrorist is, for those whom our government, at the behest of psychology authorities, are not - or will not be -considered "of sound mind" (because they are fundamentalist ['extremist'] Bible believers) go here. Thus would such Christians under enacted laws be denied their guns?]

Gun-free zones however would and do pose the problem – where guns are not allowed, those who find no problem with breaking the law would acquire any number of viable targets at their mercy. 

The controversy is, that if gun-wielding criminals are able to find such easy marks in gun-free zones in places like University campuses, military bases and certain US cities, how many more easy marks would they find if there were fewer guns among the populace! If the entire nation, or a larger preponderance of our lands were 'gun-free zones'?!

From The CONSERVATIVE REVIEW we have the following:
Strict gun laws did NOT stop the shooter.

Colleges, and this one in particular, are “Gun Free Zones” in almost every part of the country. This college actually has an even stricter weapons policy:

 ~  Possession, use, or threatened use of firearms (including but not limited to BB guns, air guns, water pistols, and paint guns) ammunition, explosives, dangerous chemicals, or any other objects as weapons on college property, except as expressly authorized by law or college regulations, is prohibited.
 ~  Possession of knives with a blade longer than 4” is prohibited.
 ~  Brandishing weapons is prohibited.
 ~  Misuse of personal defensive weapons – e.g., pepper spray, etc. is prohibited. The owner is responsible and accountable for any misuse of these devices.

In speaking of the protection of the public, this is the long held and heralded belief of liberals – that guns are a danger in our society and should be removed from the hands of people, reserved strictly for law enforcement and other similar agencies.
However, history is replete with examples of governments that have done so; and what followed was not exactly in the best interest of the people. Our American founders of the Constitution understood the purpose and value of firearms.

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence... From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable...The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference--they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." 
~~ George Washington. 

This as opposed to our current President's long held beliefs ever since he was a congressman in Chicago:

In 1998, he supported a ban on the sale of all semi-automatic guns. In 2004, he advocated banning gun sales within five miles of a school or park, which would have shut down nearly all gun stores.  

Other leaders of nations around the world, down through history, have offered their views of their people owning guns, and this list of nations and their governments is extraordinarily infamous; here are a few:

Tyrants have always loathed an armed people... In the 20th century alone, there is undeniable evidence of the evils of gun control. Let the facts of history be the evidence:

In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control under one of the bloodiest despots in modern history, Joseph Stalin. From 1929 to 1953, approximately 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1928, Germany established gun control. From 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, Christians, gypsies, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1935, China established gun control. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents were unable to defend themselves and were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1964, Guatemala established gun control. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1970, Uganda, under brutal dictator Idi Amin, established gun control. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated (Source)

Are we suggesting that this is the very intent of our Federal government, and in particular the current occupant in the White House? There are other nations such as England and Australia that have enacted gun control laws that haven't fallen into despotic and, or delusional tyranny of course. Not yet at any rate . . . 

From the immediately above article cited as “source” we have the following quote:

“Since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender firearms to their own government, the results are now in: homicides, assaults, and armed robberies are surging! In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. While the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns, and are less afraid to use them! 

“When I was in Australia a couple of years ago, I asked a friend if everyone turned in their guns. He said that about one-third did, but two-thirds hid their guns, because they know that some day they may have to defend themselves against their own government.”

The same can be said regarding the state of Massachusetts:

One of the state’s leading anti-gun activists, John Rosenthal of Stop Handgun Violence, joined the applause. “The new gun law,” he predicted, “will certainly prevent future gun violence and countless grief.” It didn’t.

The 1998 legislation did cut down, quite sharply, on the legal use of guns in Massachusetts. Within four years, the number of active gun licenses in the state had plummeted. “There were nearly 1.5 million active gun licenses in Massachusetts in 1998,” the AP reported. “In June [2002], that number was down to just 200,000.” The author of the law, state Senator Cheryl Jacques, was pleased that the Bay State’s stiff new restrictions had made it possible to “weed out the clutter.

But the law that was so tough on law-abiding gun owners had quite a different impact on criminals.

Since 1998, gun crime in Massachusetts has gotten worse, not better. In 2011, Massachusetts recorded 122 murders committed with firearms, the Globe reported this month — “a striking increase from the 65 in 1998.” Other crimes rose too. Between 1998 and 2011, "robbery with firearms climbed 20.7 percent. Aggravated assaults jumped 26.7 percent.” 

Given the nature of Barak Obama however, and his affinity for Socialist ideologists such as Saul Alinsky (author of RULES for RADICALS; a blue print for Community Organizing, a preparation strategy for forming a Socialist nation. Obama was a very proficient Community organizer during his days in Illinois and elsewhere) it would seem at the very least plausible that his intentions for our well being is duplicitous. That, as with any Socialist regime, gun control is a given.

The very premise of gun control and it's virtues have been touted long and loud by liberals aka socialists here in America, but the promised peace such would supposedly bring is based on false premises. Myths in fact - - such things as “public opinions favors gun control . . . armed citizens don't deter crime . . . gun control reduces crime . . .” and others as found here

It seems that just about every time the subject of gun control showers the media, the sales of guns sky rockets. No one wants to be left out if guns are suddenly banned and people are left defenseless against dangers both seen and unforeseen. 

Certainly our government must be aware of this phenomenon; if they genuinely wanted guns to be diminished among the American people, why would they continue to hammer on this issue, knowing the result would be even more guns purchased by the public? 

And there seems to be a correlation between the density of guns present in any quadrant of our society and the diminished crime rate that accompanies it (no criminal wants to get gunned down while perpetrating their profession, right? In the following article one set of statistics was compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice. The other was reported by the Pew Research Center).

If guns are responsible for these travesties, then spoons are the culinary culprits for all the obesity of this nation, and cars for the road fatalities. I recently read, "If gun control makes it safer by restricting law abiding citizens their firearms, then the roads will be safer by restricting motor vehicle licenses to sober drivers".

It's absurd to think that either guns, spoons or cars are guilty for the wrong doings committed with them. It's the person using those instruments that is the guilty party of course. Take guns away and these people will simply use bows and arrows, or knives,  or even sticks and stones, or their bare hands if need be.
How do we keep people from overeating? Or causing fatalities on the highway? Or preventing them from killing people with a deadly weapon?
The issue is not guns – but the human heart! And this leads me to the second half of this article.


Mankind has had at least six thousand years to prove whether or not he can govern himself; to demonstrate if he can use power responsibly, justly and truthfully. Suffice it to say that in general, he has not done well in proving this point, whether one regards the governing of nations or simply that of his own heart.

Anyone with a gun is empowered; how one handles that empowerment or any kind for that matter reveals the sort of heart one has. We dealt with this matter once before on The RED PILL Consortium: The POWER of LOVE, The LOVE of POWER.

A person of temperance is a person under control, but how do we acquire this temperance in the first place? The Law of God points out the LORD's expectation of our conduct, the standard by which we shall be judged. These laws (if we could obey them) would govern our souls in righteous living. 

For an excellent teaching on the Ten Commandments, I present Josh Boubion of The HOUSE of TRUTH Fellowship, based largely on EXODUS 20.

Some may find that they have this virtue by the wisdom of years of experience, and to a certain and limited extent, this is valid. However, the most powerful and enduring form of temperance comes from the Spirit of God, His Spirit of Love and Grace:

22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.
24 And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.
25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.

The best way to govern the heart is by enthroning the LORD Jesus Christ there; to repent of one's sin, to turn to the LORD for salvation and His abiding Spirit, and the fruit that results from such. Note that temperance is among this fruit, this fruit of God's love in our lives. 

The nature of man is a sinful nature (ROM. 3:20, 23), and sin is the essence of rebellion and lawlessness (ISAIAH 1:4). It is the very rotten fruit of this world and why there is so much suffering, oppression, injustice, etc. 

If we would have a society of people whose souls were under control – not chaotic and prone to mayhem – then they must seek the LORD and His mercy at the foot of the cross of Jesus Christ: there the brutal and unruly heart of man is replaced with a new heart (EZEK. 36:26; JOHN 3:3-5; 1 PET. 1:23) and such a heart in the meekness of the LORD will be able to wield power with such responsible conduct as is honoring to the LORD.

The basis of how we live our lives today as Christians, the faithfulness in which we minister to the LORD in our marriages, our families, our church ministry (including the Gospel and discipleship), our jobs, etc. will actually help determine the extent of our rule with Christ once He establishes His government in this world (MATT. 25:21-23). When Scripture states that the “meek shall inherit the Earth” it wasn't joking. The supreme example of meekness is the LORD Jesus Christ and He shall reign over heaven and earth as KING of Kings and LORD of Lords.

On the subject of meekness, perhaps you might consider these two teachings on the subject: MEEKNESS is NOT WEAKNESS but GREATNESSPart One and Part Two 

The very anti-thesis of meekness, holiness, righteousness, justice, faithfulness as well as love of truth and the truth of love (qualifications for rule under the Kingdom of the heaven by the way) is pride, arrogance, selfishness, wickedness, lust for power – the very characteristics of Satan himself, and those that belong in the kingdom of darkness. Since the people of this world are under the reign of Satan (whether knowingly or not according to 2 COR. 4:4; EPH. 5:7-9 and 1 THESS. 5:4-5). 

Suffice it to say, that since the whole of humanity is under such jurisdiction and such a nature, it would be impossible for them to rule themselves well with any enduring and lasting effects. 

At best we could only hold our base nature in check by legal structures based on just law (thus the need for punitive actions taken against law breakers via law enforcement and judicial infrastructures), and then this would prove a losing battle in the long term. The human race is degenerating into deplorable depravity, and we are soon approaching – if we haven't already achieved such – a level of evil that was found in the days of Noah:

5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually

The apostle Paul treated the subject of man's heart condition with extreme precision and thoroughness in ROMANS Chapter Six; let us conclude this article by an overview of this treatment.

ROMANS 6:1-6
What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

Paul's admonition here is that we as saints should not continue in sin as an excuse due to the infinite supply of God's grace; on the contrary because of the grace of God we are empowered to live our lives according to the enabling grace of the indwelling Spirit. 

The very representation of water baptism demonstrates that we are buried with Christ so that our sinful self is “dead to sin” and now provided for a new life in Christ by His grace. 

The Cross of Christ is where the LAMB of GOD died FOR our sin, and it's the same place where Christians die TO sin. This is not to suggest that Christians never sin, because we are still in possession of a sin nature (the Bible refers to such as our “flesh”; ROM. 8:1, 4, 21-22; GAL. 5:16) and we presently must confess any sin that we might commit (1 JOHN 1:7-10; 2:1-2). We have the promise that we shall ultimately be delivered from sin with this “body of death” is no more, and we come into possession of our glorified bodies (ROM. 7:24; 1 COR. 15:51-58).

ROMANS 6:7-12

7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.
11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.

Because of the truth that Christ died, but rose again with resurrection power, He has conquered sin and death; likewise – says Paul – we are to account ourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God. We as saints are to be governed by God, not by sin: and this is the essential problem with sinful humanity and why Christians may struggle in their lives against sin.

The unredeemed is governed by their sin nature, and because of his sin nature Chris Harper-Mercer committed murder of those many souls. Scripture even states that if we hate (KJV says “angry”), we have committed murder in our hearts (MATT. 5:21-22; 15:19). Again, it's not really GUN control that is the primary issue, it's SOUL control! And Christians are admonished to let righteousness rule in their lives, not sin:

ROMANS 6:13-18
13 Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.
14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
15 What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.
18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.

And the remainder of this chapter:

ROMANS 6:19-23
19 I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh: for as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.
20 For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness.
21 What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death.
22 But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.
23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Slaves of sin will acquire the wages of that hard and miserable labor, as the whips of demonic task masters crack overhead; the eventual and grievous fruit of sin which is death. Chris Harper-Mercer is an unredeemed sinner, who for the sin nature that permeates his being has seen the fruit of his sin: the death of those nine souls; eventually his own death as well unless he repents and seeks the LORD for salvation! 

So is the case with us all who do not yet know Christ; too, too many people esteem themselves as “basically good” and declare that justification by saying, “It's not like I've ever murdered anybody!” (but if you take the words of the LORD Jesus seriously, any one with hate in their heart towards another human being, has committed murder already!). However, the fires of hell will hold many countless numbers of souls who never committed murder, but have rejected Christ and His offer of salvation nonetheless: 

8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. 

1 THESS. 1:7-9

7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
9 Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;

So then, in conclusion, let me ask you the question that saints of old would inquire of one another:

How goes it with your soul?” Is it under the leadership of the Holy and Righteous LORD, Jesus Christ? Or are you still governed by your sin nature which will lead you (and perhaps others, such as the victims of Mr. Mercer) to death? Turn to the LORD, for you know not what may become of your life today or tomorrow.

Monday, August 24, 2015

The Anti-Christ Agenda 2030 - An Upgrade of Agenda 21

In a TTUF Profile article, Anne Kisly documented the path of perdition that has set the vast majority of humanity against the Holy and Just rule of God and goes on to show how the plans and schemes of mankind are being orchestrated by 'the father of lies', the god of this world (2 COR. 4:4). These schemes will result in the fruition of Satan's rule over this wayward planet during the time of the great Tribulation via the anti-Christ.

We witness daily the methods and means of implementing these plans towards this end. Let's have a look at this TTUF Profile that examines Maurice Strong and AGENDA 21:

The enemy of our souls has declared war on God. It is he who would rob, kill and destroy us, as well as the nations of the world. It is he who desires to be worshiped and enthroned by the masses. It is Satan, the master manipulator, the king of thievery and lies and every evil and wicked device ever imagined. For he indeed is the one who stood pridefully against, and in competition with the Creator of the Universe. It is he, who demanding his own way above Almighty God, has been cast out of heaven and judgment placed upon his shoulders. His end is near and time is running out. His plan is to deceive and steal as many as he can away from truth, salvation and God.

We are witnesses of this very thing. Today, the nations of the world have turned their backs on the living God. They, like the liar who whispers in their ear, despise God’s way, God’s truth and the life he offers us through the redemption of Jesus Christ. They have taken of the forbidden fruit and have believed the lie of Satan. They like their father, the devil, have also declared war on God, and on Christianity.

Jesus said in JOHN 15:18 – 20
If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.
If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also

The end goal of Satan is a one world order in which he is openly worshiped and given unswerving allegiance by every human soul living at that time. There are different spheres of this world that must be brought under the influence, the direct guidance of Satan: the world's governments, the money systems, the religions – all to the exclusion of anything which comes from the LORD God. Even more so, the intentional anti-God motivations which we see increasing as these last days proceed.

A bit more about Maurice Strong from this TTUF Profile:

Maurice Strong was born in Canada and has worked for decades with the United Nations. In 1972 he was Secretary General of the United Nations conference on the Human Environment, and thus launched the “GREEN” movement.

Behind UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan stands the powerful Canadian multi-billionaire Maurice Strong. He is the founder of both the World Economic Council and Planetary Citizens; he has served as director of the World Future Society, trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and Aspen Institute, and a member of the Club of Rome.

As head of the Earth Council, he began to prepare a global code of conduct based on global values and radical environmental guidelines. For more about these organizations and Mr. Strong's involvement with them, read this article from the web site Hope To The End.

Strong led the 1992 'Earth Summit' in Rio de Janeiro (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development). It produced the controversial Biodiversity Treaty and AGENDA 21 — the monstrous plan for reorganizing the world along environmental guidelines. One of his offices is only two blocks away from the White House.”

In order to achieve this, humanity must be brought under complete subjection and control, hence, such documents as AGENDA 21, and the even more invasive protocols as outlined in AGENDA 2030. To learn more about what AGENDA 21 entails, read this.

In another TTUF Report by Anne Kisly we have this quote by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair:

'The challenge to humanity is to adopt new ways of thinking, new ways of acting, new ways of organizing itself in society, in short, new ways of living'." ~ Our Creative Diversity, UNESCO, p.11

"...we are, of course, refashioning the British constitution and our system of government, decentralizing power, reinventing government, promoting a new and different partnership between public and private sector. It is indeed as Al Gore has just said to us, a Third way (also known in certain particulars as The Third Wave), not all left nor new right, but a new centre and centre left governing philosophy for the future." 

~ Transcript of a speech given by Tony Blair, the British Prime Minister, at a breakfast with Vice President Gore.

The details of these statements may be examined further for those who wish to pursue this in an article by Berit Kjos of Cross Roads ministry, REINVENTING THE WORLD

Global Transformation, Sustainable Development, Social Justice, Emergent, Forward Thinking…these are just a few of the ever increasing number of new terms being tossed around today, and I’m afraid that most people don’t really understand the nature of their true meaning. 

For example, a couple of years ago the word ‘Change’ became the popular slogan for the presidential campaign. The struggling Bush Administration’s unpopular war in Iraq and the struggling economy dampened the spirit of America. The bank failures, the bail outs and an uncertain future sealed the fate of the upcoming election resulting in a mass convergence of change. All jumped aboard the promised ‘Change’ train. I suppose most believed that it sounded hopeful, and just what Americans were looking for in a looming crisis. As we all witnessed, change won the election.”


But this is an agenda that the 'Goblins' have only just gotten started with; AGENDA 21 represents only some of the first steps of this global plan. This September of 2015 there will be another convention to further these goals, under the auspices of the UN, held in NYC and attended by some of the most influential people of this world, including the current Pope. 

Let's search through the various sites that I've researched and glean from them what else the 'god of this world' has in store for humanity. Before we do however, I want to emphasize a certain point:

These globalists have amassed so much personal power, and have such a diabolical mind set, I am hard pressed to disbelieve that they are either possessed or heavily influenced by the non-corporeal agencies and intelligences that we commonly refer to as demons. If this is the case, these globalists cannot do much of anything regarding The Plan except by the authorization of these nefarious beings. But these “principalities and powers” (EPH. 6:12) cannot themselves do anything except by the authorization of their own leader, Satan. 

As well as this, we know from Scripture that Satan cannot do anything beyond what God has dictated to him; thus as bad as it may get on planet Earth, we understand that the LORD is still has everything under His sovereign control. He Who holds the future in His nail scarred hands also holds the destiny of every single one of His children. Let us not cower or fear what may come, only let us be prayerfully aware of the current circumstances and trends so that we will not be caught off guard, and prepared to face this time with courage and faith in the LORD!

From the END of the AMERICAN DREAM web site we have the following

If you didn’t like 'Agenda 21', then you really are not going to like 'The 2030 Agenda'. Next month, the United Nations is going to launch “The 2030 Agenda” at a major conference that will be held from September 25th to September 27th in New York City.

UPDATE: A recent article, published 8-11-2017, entitled D.I.C.E.D. – The UN’s Environmental Constitution For The World reveals even more of this global plan for ultimate control over all the people of the world in the name of 'saving the environment' through 'sustainable development'."

~~ end of UPDATE

The Pope is actually traveling to New York to deliver an address which will kick off this conference.  Unlike Agenda 21, which primarily focused on the environment, the 2030 Agenda is truly a template for governing the entire planet.  In addition to addressing climate change, it also sets ambitious goals for areas such as economics, health, energy, education, agriculture, gender equality and a whole host of other issues.  

As you will see below, this global initiative is being billed as a 'new universal Agenda' for humanity. If you are anything like me, alarm bells are going off in your head right about now.
This new agenda is solidly rooted in a document known as “Agenda 21″ that was originally adopted by the United Nations back in 1992.

Since that time, Agenda 21 has been modified and amended numerous times.  Noteworthy changes occurred in 1997, 2002 and 2012.

But now the UN’s sustainable development program is being given an entirely new name, and the scope of this agenda is being broadened dramatically.  The following is what the official United Nations website has to say about it…

The United Nations is now in the process of defining Sustainable Development Goals as part a new sustainable development agenda that must finish the job and leave no one behind. This agenda, to be launched at the Sustainable Development Summit in September...” 2015, is currently being discussed at the UN General Assembly, where Member States and civil society are making contributions to the agenda.

What many people don't realize is that the UN is not merely an international political entity; its roots are well grounded in occult philosophy and directives (as has been examined in the article linked above called 'The Plan'). The late Robert Muller Assistant General Secretary to the UN was adept at such beliefs and these were promoted heavily via the Theosophical Society that has many NGO's associated with the UN. 

People such as U Thant (UN leader) and Teilhard Chardin were spiritual men (of the wrong sort) that Muller revered and emulated. On the subject of planetary spirituality and its coming 'Renaissance' Robert Muller had this to say:

I would never have thought that I would discover spirituality in the United Nations!... Perhaps spirituality is such a fundamental human need that it always reappears in one form or another in life and throughout history and that we are about to witness now its renaissance in a global, planetary context.

Muller, Barbara Marx Hubbard, and many other occultists and New Spiritualists propose that the 'body of Christ' is not at all limited to the genuine church that has been founded on the Rock, the LORD Jesus Christ (MATT. 16:18) but rather is an appellation describing all of the world! Truly, the Mother of Harlots is emerging before our very eyes! 

For more on the spiritual journey of darkness taken by Robert Muller, visit Gary Kah's web site HOPE For The WORLD and this article The NEW RELIGIOUS ORDER.

The Jesuits have long been suspected of being manipulators and schemers of the global sort, pulling strings in the shadows that either influenced or even brought entire nations under their control. Their founder Ignatius Loyola was deeply into occult meditation and encouraged his followers to engage in such, developing paranormal abilities (via demon possession) and to pledge unswerving loyalty to the furthering of the Roman Catholic Church. 

Many suggest that they are the ones who are actually in control of this religious institution and the Pope is merely the figure head. The current Pope however, is a Jesuit and has already established such an influential position (even more so than any other Pope) that his presence is being solicited by the coming Convention in NYC, AGENDA 2030. What sort of propositions will he make in support of this global agenda program? 

The following suggests, much! We offer this information only as a possibility (and we do not necessarily agree with everything in this article). If in fact, there is more truth to these assertions than not, America may end up looking quite different than it does now. Her citizens may find themselves “stacked and packed” in huge city regions, living in poverty and enslavement while the globalists enjoy immense luxuries and freedoms in the country side. Such conglomerations of the citizenry into congested city regions could look something like this:

Conspiracy theorists have for more than two decades viewed 'the new world order' as a villainous plot to enslave humanity, citing certain facts and figures to substantiate their claims. Today the preferred term is 'global governance' and it's used on university campuses, in governments, and various organizations without the Orwellian stigma associated with its former term.

The EU and its many think tanks routinely talk about governance, sustainable development, global economy and global justice with an air of legitimacy, couched in benign language and intent. The very objective of 2030 claims to have humanity's best interest at heart. However, anyone with a biblical world view will recognize the 'set up' of a singular world government whose helm will be manned by “the son of perdition” - the Beast of Revelation.

We turn to the site called SALVATION and SURVIVAL with Belle Ringer and what she as a Christian woman thinks of all of this . . . 

Here is an article she wrote recently entitled Think Agenda 21 Abuses Our Freedoms? Take A Look At Agenda 2030:

Thanks to the website, End of the American Dream,for providing the following exciting news (wink, wink). Next month, the Pope is traveling to New York City to kick off a conference at the United Nations in which "The 2030 Agenda" will be presented to the world.

We are all familiar with the 'sustainable' aspects of the UN's Agenda 21, whose stated goal was to protect the environment in the form of a "comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations system, governments and major groups, in every area in which humans impact the environment.” This was conveniently encapsulated under a comprehensive objective called 'climate change' (Note: Statements made in the link prior are not all endorsed by this author of The RED PILL Consortium).

Now, of course, it was also stated that such plans were non-binding, and voluntary, but someone forgot to tell the governments of the world (including ours) who have been trying to implement restrictions on the world's human population through Agenda 21 since its inception in 1992

Under the guise of providing adequate shelter for all; promoting sustainable land-use planning and management; promoting sustainable energy and transport systems in human settlements; and other supposed moral objectives to care for the world's underprivileged, it is really all about terminating our private property rights in favor of confiscation and controlling the world's population and food supply... all voluntary, of course.

But this new global initiative is being billed as 'a new Universal Agenda for humanity'.  In addition to addressing climate change, it also sets ambitious goals for areas such as economics, health, energy, education, agriculture, gender equality and a whole host of other issues.... in other words, the globalists want to usher in the One World Government that controls every aspect of our lives.  Think I'm kidding? Here is a portion of the preamble of Agenda 2030:

This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognize that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development.

All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want, and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind.”

AGENDA 21 makes the benevolent claim that global authorities want to rid the world from the tyranny of poverty and want; but what will they replace it with but plain and simple tyranny? The Dangers of Agenda 21 are not self evident for those who read the benign language this global act is written with, but the dangers are real and they threaten personal freedom, economic security, political sovereignty of nations, and restrictive government. And again, what this agenda has objectified is nothing compared to the far more comprehensive AGENDA 2030...

More from Belle Ringer's article:

Notice that the word sustainable' is evident . . . while there is no mention of individual rights or how they are going to get individual landowners to cooperate. And this new agenda gives no perception that is voluntary, does it?

You see individual liberty and freedom aren't really conducive to a 'global initiative'. You can't have people doing what they want if you plan on controlling every aspect of their lives. After all, it's 'bad for the planet'. And you might be interested to know that one of the goals of the sustainable development globalists is to push the human population into giant “mega-cities” and to allow nature to recapture much of what has already been settled by humanity. See where this is going? They can't have people living in rural areas growing their own food, and living sustainable lives on their own! They must be controlled!

What will be ratified next month by authority of this AGENDA 2030? How far will the UN powers extend and intrude into our personal lives here in America and other free nations of the world? That has yet to be determined; but we will find out soon enough.

In the mean time, let us as Christians draw closer to the LORD than ever before, setting our minds upon Him so that we may remain in His perfect peace, and draw courage from His Spirit as we attend the KING of Glory in prayer and intercessions for the saints the world over. The world is falling into increasingly darker days of prophetic dangers and the worst is yet to come!

ISAIAH 26:3-4
3 Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in thee.
4 Trust ye in the Lord for ever: for in the Lord Jehovah is everlasting strength:

For more on these issues please set aside some time to watch this video (44 minutes plus long; and the subsequent parts you will find in the side bar of this youtube presentation); this pastor, Charles Lawson, presents a panoramic view of much that will be witnessed in these last days, as prophesied by the Holy Scriptures.

May we the saints keep our eyes on the skies and not believe the lies: The LORD JESUS CHRIST returns soon from on high!

For even more on this, see the following:


AGENDA 21 In Less Than 5 Minutes


Saturday, July 25, 2015


The term has been around now for a couple of decades; it's meant to describe any who have an irrational, unwarranted fear of the religion of Islam and of its adherents, the Muslim people of the world.

Certainly as Christians we are not to live a life of fear, but a life that is sound of mind, flowing with love and endowed with power (2 TIM. 1:7), and we are to have a deep and abiding fear of the LORD if we ever hope to express wisdom in our lives (PSALM 111:10).

We are not to fear persecution or tribulation (2 TIM. 3:12; REV. 2:10) from hostile forces be they from people or situations, but embrace them as ordained of God, for His holy purposes and part of His sovereign plan in our lives (ROM. 5:3; 2 THESS. 1:4).

So why then do we want to even address this subject? 

As these days proceed, those of us that are paying attention can see coming, up ahead, a time when potentially severe persecution will strike hard and heavy on American soil. We need to understand that what we are being spoon-fed by the media are lies, blatant lies that will blind side anyone that believes them.

From The POLITICAL OUTCAST we have the following:

“In what can only be described as academic double-speak, [the Arizona State University] academics have determined that even though the Koran encourages and commends its followers to global jihad in submission to Allah (after all, Islam means “submit”), “radical” and “extremist” sects of Islam (as they are called by the media) do not refer to or interpret their holy writings in this way. 

“In fact, the researchers were 'surprised' by the lack of references in al Qaeda and al Shabaab writings to the 'Verse of Swords,' or Sura 9:5, which reads: “When the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.”

“Notice that the study does not try to hide the fact that the Koran does indeed teach jihad; its primary point of discussion is that radical groups that appear to take the Koran seriously don’t bother quoting the violent verses in their own writings. And this proves what exactly? Christians who take the Bible seriously don’t quote JOHN 3:16 in all of their writings either. Does this mean that they don’t believe it, live by it, and hold it very near and dear? Of course not. If this is what passes for academic research in 2012, I’m going to apply for a grant.”

We have heard ever since the days of 9/11 (and even before then) that “Islam is peace” that it actually means “peace” when in fact it does not; the Arabic word for peace is Salam. “Islam” itself, as pointed out in the above quote, means “submission” and when all the world is submitted to Islam then - and ONLY then - will there be peace in the world. But this sort of peace will only benefit Muslims born to the faith, Gentile converts will still be treated like 3rd or 4th class almost-citizens. 

History has proven this out repeatedly in how Muslims have treated Jewish citizens in their Islamic nations. To examine this, consider the following reports based on Joan Peter's book, From Time Immemorial from The RED PILL Consortium:     

“During the times of war and the outbreak of hostilities between Arabs and Jews, there were many refugees that fled their homes and sought refuge elsewhere; what few appreciate is that this didn't entail Arabs only, (which our mass media has focused on) but also Jews (who fled various Islamic states, and sought to relocate in Israel. In 1948 more than 850,000 Jews lived in the Arab world. Today (this book was published in 1984) there are less than 29,000.

“It was during these times of war when Jews were treated most miserably, however even in times of 'peace' living conditions were hardly any better!

“It was during these chapters in FROM TIME IMMEMORIAL that reading was most difficult for me, learning of the atrocities perpetrated on the Jews; and we know virtually nothing of these times because the history of these events were conveniently omitted by the powers that be who reveal their anti-Semitic attitudes.

From chapter 3 of FROM TIME IMMEMORIAL - The Arab Jew:

"Contrary to the myth that Jews lived in harmony with the Arabs before the Zionist state, innumerable authoritative works document decisively the subjugation, oppression, and spasmodic anti-Jewish eruptions of violence that darkened the existence of the Jews in Muslim Arab countries.

“In the Charter of Omar (Mohammad's immediate successor) laws for dhimmi (non-Muslims) were developed and any dhimmi that violated any of these laws were slain. Jews were forbidden to touch the Koran, forced to wear a distinctive habit (blue or black) with a sash and compelled to wear a yellow piece of clothing as a badge (long before Hitler enforced the yellow 6-pointed star on Jews relegated to ghettos), and required to bury their dead without letting their grief be heard by the Muslims.

“Such a 'privileged life' at the benevolence of the Muslims was to be repaid by the 'grateful Jews' in the forms of personal head and property taxes; such was justified through the writings of the Koran:

"Fight against those [Jews and Christians] who believe not in Allah...until they pay the tribute (Jaziyah) readily, being brought low." Surah IX: 29

“The head tax was enforced in some form until 1908 in Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Turkey; until 1925 in Iran; and still enforceable in Yemen today.

“Any Jew's word was considered invalid in a court of law, but any charge against a Jew by a Muslim was held fast even if evidence were produced to prove the contrary. A Muslim who killed a fellow Muslim would himself die, yet if that same Muslim were to kill a Jew, no prosecution would be sought by a court of law.

"Demeaning of the Jews as represented by the Charter has carried down through the centuries, its implementation inflicted with varying degrees of cruelty or inflexibility, depending upon the character of the particular Muslim ruler. When that rule was tyrannical, life was abject slavery, as in Yemen, where one of the Jews' tasks was to clean the city latrines and another was to clear the streets of animal carcasses-without pay, and often on the Sabbath."

“Over the centuries, as recorded by various travelers, Jews were forced to live in ghettos, called hara, mellahor simply Jewish Quarter. In 14th century Egypt one traveler recorded their observations of Jews living in a ghetto and some five hundred years later, another traveler reported that the Jews were still in residence there.

“Throughout this difficult chapter, I read of the terrible plight of Jews who lived in Islamic nations such as Yemen, Aden, Iraq, Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Syria, Lebanon, and Libya; in each case, the stories though different, carried the same elements of prejudice, injustice, oppression, abuse, hatred and violence. Some details were simply too grisly to describe here in this article.”

There are many Muslims and supporters of Islam that protest the use of such citations of the Quran, saying that there are many verses that speak of amicable relations between Muslims and Christians and even Jews ('After all' they say, 'we are all Semitic!') but what many non-Muslims fail to recognize is the imposition of what's known as the 'Law of Abrogation', that is to say, the latter Surah's recorded in the Quran (generally speaking) supersede the former ones. 

An examination of the Quran shows that the earlier chapters of the Quran, when Mohammad was more conciliatory and desirous of winning over the Jews (and Christians) and himself be recognized as a prophet by both, spoke high praise of their faiths and books (even going so far as to instructing his followers to face Jerusalem – not Mecca – during their times of prayer). Later verses however reveal an emphasized and ardent command to vilify and persecute – even kill Jews (first) and Christians (second)! 

From the web site we have the following:

“The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God, however this can work both ways. Most of today's Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.

“Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed.  Muhammad's own martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.”

On this page we find over two dozen admonitions from the Quran to commit violence against 'infidels' and even more of such from subsequent hadiths (Quranic interpretations of the Islamic text).

Surah 2:191-193; 2:244; 2:216; 3:56; 3:151; 4:74; 4:76; 4:89; 4:95; 4:104; 5:33; 8:12; 8:15; 8:39; 8:57; 8:67; 8:59-60; 8:65; 9:5; 9:14; 9:20; 9:29; 9:30; 9:38-39; 9:41-42; 9:73; 9:88; 9:111; 9:123; 17:16; 18:65-81; 21:44; 25:52; 33:60-62; 47:3-4; 47:35; 48:17; 48:29 (related verses - 65:10; 40:46; 50:26); 61:4, 9; 61:10-12; 66:9.

Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at 

The multiple conquests of Mohammad throughout the Middle East as recorded in history are well documented, revealing the militaristic protocols of this religion. 

To encourage the idea that fear of Muslim violence is merely 'Islamophobic' school text books portray the conquests of Islam as benign and peaceful enterprises where people converted willingly and not at all under duress:

“Ironically, these exceptions are now portrayed as the rule in America's classrooms: many textbooks suggest or at least imply that most people who converted to Islam did so under no duress, but rather through peaceful contacts with merchants and traders; that they eagerly opted to convert to Islam for the religion's intrinsic appeal, without noting the many debilitation’s conquered non-Muslims avoided—extra taxes, second-rate social status, enforced humiliation, etc.—by converting to Islam. In fact, in the first century, and due to these debilitations, many conquered peoples sought to convert to Islam only to be rebuffed by the caliphate, which preferred to keep them as subdued—and heavily taxed—subjects, not as Muslim equals.

“Meanwhile, as U.S. textbooks equivocate about the Muslim conquests, in the schoolrooms of the Muslim world, the conquests are not only taught as a matter of course, but are glorified: their rapidity and decisiveness are regularly portrayed as evidence that Allah was in fact on the side of the Muslims (and will be again, so long as Muslims uphold their communal duty of waging jihad).” ~ taken from the above article on The Middle East Forum.

School children are being indoctrinated with this false notion that Islam is an admirable and benign religion that is both intelligent and morally superior. 

They are leading children in Islamic prayer, reading the Quran, and even donning Islamic-style clothing. Yet this same American Public School system screams “separation of church and state” if students want to hold an AFTER SCHOOL Bible study??

Muslims and supporters of such would also protest this point, saying that Christianity likewise utilized military conquest in it's own promotion. However, we are talking about the founder of Islam, Mohammad and the formative years of this religion. Jesus Christ is the founder of the Christian faith and as with its own formative years, spread the Gospel by peaceful means and promoted the “love of enemies” command rather than “slay the idolators”. It's only centuries later when the Roman Catholic church gained the upper hand and its pontifical orders in raising armies, sending them off to conquest, that such perverse and unbiblical acts were enforced.

For more on the religion of Islam and its history, beliefs as well as its more current activities and how we are to respond to such, please see the following from TTUF: ENGAGING ISLAM (Part 1 of 3).

We have been regularly assaulted in the mass media of images and videos of hapless victims bound and kneeling in front of hooded and masked ISIS (Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) members, who then proceed in beheading the infidels. We are told that these terrorists are not true to the Islamic faith, that they are 'extremists' and vilified as 'fundamentalists' who hold to a too-strict interpretation of the Quran*. Yet we have noted that such exhortations are found in the Quran (see Quranic citations listed above) and they are still going on with horrifying regularity today

*The vilification of any religion that is “extreme” in their “fundamentalist” interpretations of their holy book is already being witnessed today. The Christian left – as well as our own government's attitude towards biblical Christians who dare to declare that the Bible is the inerrant, infallible and indisputable Word of God or even basic Constitutional rights of freedom reveals this to be the case. These are being viewed as "potential terrorists" while more and more we are witnessing real Islamic terrorist groups being removed from our government's 'watch list'!

Yet even if we look over the last mere 15 years of our world's history, we can readily glean incident after incident of Muslims committing atrocities against Christians (let alone Hindus. Buddhists, etc – and to be fair, vice-versa regarding these other religions in select cases). Are we to believe we have nothing to fear from Islam then? That Islam is not a threat to America?

What about Sharia law? Is this an equitable and fair legal system that will ensure “justice for all”? Or will it dramatically favor Muslims over non-Muslims, or even drag non-Muslims into oppression?

Here are a few examples:

- A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of: 1) an apostate 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Vigilante street justice and honor killing is acceptable.
- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim, but will get it for killing a Muslim.
- Sharia never abolished slavery, sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.
- Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging even for crimes of sin such as adultery.

Just as Muslims are staking out their own territories within nations across Europe just so, there are areas here in America where it is dangerous for non-Muslims to go, because these are dominated by Muslim neighborhoods. Dearborn, Michigan is unofficially known today as 'Little Istanbul'. 

Carefully tracking the actions and activities of Muslims who populated England and France, one can see that initially they were conciliatory and cooperative when they were fewer in number, but growing more belligerent and bold as their numbers increased. We can expect such as well here in America, and have seen this already in cities and regions where Muslim population are in the majority.

We've been told repeatedly by the current President of the United States that Islam is peace, and that it was essential in the founding of our nation (a blatant lie, it was not at all essential, merely present during the time of our founding) – and that we are not a Christian nation (we were in fact, founded as a nation predominantly populated by Christians as is readily evident by examining State Constitutions).

Will there be another 9-11 in America's future? Can we expect terrorist acts to strike our shopping malls, or our elementary schools? This remains to be seen, of course – yet if Islam is continued to made to feel welcome in our land, if we make accommodation to Islam and favor it over all other religions, if we capitulate to Sharia and demands made by Muslims, we will be perceived as weaklings and such 'peace-seeking' tactics by ignorant Westerners will only excite Muslims to increase their protocols in penetrating our society. 

Australia has some hardline tactics employed against violent and 'extreme' Muslim protests as does Russia, where Putin had some hard core statements to Muslims who demanded Sharia law.

It seems rather certain however, that if 'extreme' Muslims continue to take advantage of America's compliance of their demands, they will find themselves enjoying special status as they have in places like England, France or even Denmark and Holland.

That's not being irrational, that's simply being perceptively observant.

For more on these issues, visit the youtube channel for ACTS17APOLOGETICS.